Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 9beb33b1 authored by rhatto's avatar rhatto
Browse files

Eros and Civilization: Phantasy and Utopia

parent 885e0584
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
[[!meta title="Eros and Civilization"]]
* Author: Hebert Marcuse
* Some subjects covered (keywords): productivity, efficiency, labor, repression, domination, alienation, automation.
## Snippets
......@@ -591,6 +592,11 @@ Superego:
repression, of uninhibited desire and gratification -- but reality proceeds
according to the laws of reason, no longer committed to the dream language.
[...]
The danger of abusing the discovery of the truth value of imagination for
retrogressive tendencies is exemplified by the work of Carl Jung.
## Unsublimated pleasure
Smell and taste give, as it were, unsublimated pleasure per se (and unrepressed
......@@ -618,6 +624,117 @@ Superego:
is more at home in such sub-real and surreal processes as dreaming,
daydreaming, play, the "stream of consciousness."
[...]
The surrealists recognized the revolutionary implications of Freud' s
discoveries: "Imagination is perhaps about to reclaim its rights."
13 But when they asked, "Cannot the dream also be applied to the solution of
the fundamental problems of life?" 14 they went beyond psychoanalysis in
demanding that the dream be made into reality without compromising its content.
Art allied itself with the revolution. Uncompromising adherence to the strict
truth value of imagination comprehends reality more fully. That the
propositions of the artistic imagination are untrue in terms of the actual
organization of the facts belongs to the essence of their truth: The truth that
some proposition respecting an actual occasion is untrue may express the vital
truth as to the aesthetic achievement. It expresses the "great refusal" which
is its primary characteristic. 15 This Great Refusal is the protest against
unnecessary repression, the struggle for the ultimate form of freedom -- "to
live without anxiety." 16 But this idea could be formulated without punishment
only in the language of art. In the more realistic context of political theory
and even philosophy, it was almost universally defamed as utopia.
### Utopia
The relegation of real possibilities to the no-man's land of utopia is itself
an essential element of the ideology of the performance principle. If the
construction of a nonrepressive instinctual development is oriented, not on the
subhistorical past, but on the historical present and mature civilization, the
very notion of utopia loses its meaning. The negation of the performance
principle emerges not against but with the progress of conscious rationality;
it presupposes the highest maturity of civilization. The very achievements of
the performance principle have intensified the discrepancy between the archaic
unconscious and conscious processes of man, on the one hand, and his actual
potentialities, on the other. The history of mankind seems to tend toward
another turning point in the vicissitudes of the instincts. And, just as at the
preceding turning points, the adaptation of the archaic mental structure to the
new environment would mean another "castrophe" -- an explosive change in the
environment itself. However, while the first turning point was, according to
the Freudian hypothesis, an event in geological history, and while the second
occurred at the beginning of civilization, the third turning point would be
located at the highest attained level of civilization. The actor in this event
would be no longer the historical animal man but the conscious, rational
subject that has mastered and appropriated the objective world as the arena of
his realization. The historical factor contained in Freud' s theory of
instincts has come to fruition in history when the basis of Ananke ( Lebensnot)
-- which, for Freud, provided the rationale for the repressive reality
principle -- is undermined by the progress of civilization.
Still, there is some validity in the argument that, despite all progress,
scarcity and immaturity remain great enough to prevent the realization of the
principle "to each according to his needs." The material as well as mental
resources of civilization are still so limited that there must be a vastly
lower standard of living if social productivity were redirected toward the
universal gratification of individual needs: many would have to give up
manipulated comforts if all were to live a human life. Moreover, the prevailing
international structure of industrial civilization seems to condemn such an
idea to ridicule. This does not invalidate the theoretical insistence that the
performance principle has become obsolescent. The reconciliation between
pleasure and reality principle does not depend on the existence of abundance
for all. The only pertinent question is whether a state of civilization can be
reasonably envisaged in which human needs are fulfilled in such a manner and to
such an extent that surplus-repression can be eliminated.
Such a hypothetical state could be reasonably assumed at two points, which lie
at the opposite poles of the vicissitudes of the instincts: one would be
located at the primitive beginnings of history, the other at its most mature
stage. The first would refer to a non-oppressive distribution of scarcity (as
may, for example, have existed in matriarchal phases of ancient society). The
second would pertain to a rational organization of fully developed industrial
society after the conquest of scarcity. The vicissitudes of the instincts would
of course be very different under these two conditions, but one decisive
feature must be common to both: the instinctual development would be
non-repressive in the sense that at least the surplus-repression necessitated
by the interests of domination would not be imposed upon the instincts. This
quality would reflect the prevalent satisfaction of the basic human needs (most
primitive at the first, vastly extended and refined at the second stage),
sexual as well as social: food, housing, clothing, leisure. This satisfaction
would be (and this is the important point) without toil -- that is, without the
rule of alienated labor over the human existence. Under primitive conditions,
alienation has not yet arisen because of the primitive character of the needs
themselves, the rudimentary (personal or sexual) character of the division of
labor, and the absence of an institutionalized hierarchical specialization of
functions. Under the "ideal" conditions of mature industrial civilization,
alienation would be completed by general automatization of labor, reduction of
labor time to a minimum , and exchangeability of functions. Since the length
of the working day is itself one of the principal repressive factors imposed
upon the pleasure principle by the reality principle, the reduction of the
working day to a point where the mere quantum of labor time no longer arrests
human development is the first prerequisite for freedom. Such reduction by
itself would almost certainly mean a considerable decrease in the standard of
living prevalent today in the most advanced industrial countries. But the
regression to a lower standard of living, which the collapse of the performance
principle would bring about, does not militate against progress in freedom.
The argument that makes liberation conditional upon an ever higher standard of
living all too easily serves to justify the perpetuation of repression. The
definition of the standard of living in terms of automobiles , television sets,
airplanes, and tractors is that of the performance principle itself. Beyond the
rule of this principle, the level of living would be measured by other
criteria: the universal gratification of the basic human needs, and the freedom
from guilt and fear -- internalized as well as external, instinctual as well as
rrational." "La vraie civilization. . n' est pas dans le gaz, ni dans la
vapeur, ni dans les tables tournantes. Elle est dans la diminution des traces
du pêché originel" 17 -- this is the definition of progress beyond the rule of
the performance principle.
Under optimum conditions, the prevalence, in mature civilization, of material
and intellectual wealth would be such as to allow painless gratification of
needs, while domination would no longer systematically forestall such
gratification. In this case, the quantum of instinctual energy still to be
diverted into necessary labor (in turn completely mechanized and rationalized)
would be so small that a large area of repressive constraints and
modifications, no longer sustained by external forces , would collapse.
### Misc
But, again, Freud shows that this repressive system does not really solve the
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment