Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit 885e0584 authored by rhatto's avatar rhatto
Browse files

More on Eros and Civilization

parent ac3b70a2
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -414,7 +414,184 @@ Superego:
than ever before. This time there shall be no killing of the father, not even a
"symbolic" killing -- because he may not find a successor.
### Misc
### Repression due to exogenous factors: the central argument
Therefore, if the historical process tended to make obsolete the institutions
of the performance principle, it would also tend to make obsolete the
organization of the instincts -- that is to say, to release the instincts from
the constraints and diversions required by the performance principle. This
would imply the real possibility of a gradual elimination of
surplus-repression, whereby an expanding area of destructiveness could be
absorbed or neutralized by strengthened libido. Evidently, Freud' s theory
precludes the construction of any psychoanalytical utopia. If we accept his
theory and still maintain that there is historical substance in the idea of a
non-repressive civilization, then it must be derivable from Freud's instinct
theory itself. His concepts must be examined to discover whether or not they
contain elements that require reinterpretation. This approach would parallel
the one used in the preceding sociological discussion.
[...]
Freud maintains that an essential conflict between the two principles is
inevitable; however, in the elaboration of his theory, this inevitability seems
to be opened to question. The conflict, in the form it assumes in civilization,
is said to be caused and perpetuated by the prevalence of Ananke, Lebensnot,
the struggle for existence. (The later stage of the instinct theory, with the
concepts of Eros and death instinct, does not cancel this thesis: Lebensnot
now appears as the want and deficiency inherent in organic life itself.) The
struggle for existence necessitates the repressive modification of the
instincts chiefly because of the lack of sufficient means and resources for
integral, painless and toilless gratification of instinctual needs. If this is
true, the repressive organization of the instincts in the struggle for
existence would be due to exogenous factors -- exogenous in the sense that
they are not inherent in the "nature" of the instincts but emerge from the
specific historical conditions under which the instincts develop.
[...]
According to Freud, this distinction is meaningless, for the instincts
themselves are "historical"; 1 there is no instinctual structure "outside" the
historical structure. However, this does not dispense with the necessity of
making the distinction -- except that it must be made within the historical
structure itself. The latter appears as stratified on two levels: (a) the
phylogenetic-biological level, the development of the animal man in the
struggle with nature; and (b) the sociological level, the development of
civilized individuals and groups in the struggle among themselves and with
their environment .
The two levels are in constant and inseparable interaction, but factors
generated at the second level are exogenous to the first and have therefore a
different weight and validity (although, in the course of the development, they
can "sink down" to the first level): they are more relative; they can change
faster and without endangering or reversing the development of the genus. This
difference in the origin of instinctual modification underlies the distinction
we have introduced between repression and surplus-repression; 2 the latter
originates and is sustained at the sociological level.
[...]
For his metapsychology, it is not decisive whether the inhibitions are imposed
by scarcity or by the hierarchical distribution of scarcity, by the struggle
for existence or by the interest in domination. And indeed the two factors --
the phylogenetic-biological and the sociological -- have grown together in the
recorded history of civilization. But their union has long since become
"unnatural" -and so has the oppressive "modification" of the pleasure principle
by the reality principle. Freud' s consistent denial of the possibility of an
essential liberation of the former implies the assumption that scarcity is as
permanent as domination -- an assumption that seems to beg the question. By
virtue of this assumption, an extraneous fact obtains the theoretical dignity
of an inherent element of mental life, inherent even in the primary instincts.
In the light of the long-range trend of civilization, and in the light of
Freud' s own interpretation of the instinctual development, the assumption must
be questioned. The historical piossibility of a gradual decontrolling of the
instinctual development must be taken seriously, perhaps even the historical
necessity -- if civilization is to progress to a higher stage of freedom.
[...]
The diagram sketches a historical sequence from the beginning of organic life
(stages 2 and 3), through the formative stage of the two primary instincts (5),
to their "modified " development as human instincts in civilization (6-7). The
turning points are at stages 3 and 6. They are both caused by exogenous factors
by virtue of which the definite formation as well as the subsequent dynamic of
the instincts become "historically acquired." At stage 3, the exogenous factor
is the " unrelieved tension " created by the birth of organic life; the
"experience" that life is less "satisfactory," more painful, than the preceding
stage generates the death instinct as the drive for relieving this tension
through regression. The working of the death instinct thus appears as the
result of the trauma of primary frustration: want and pain, here caused by a
geological-biological event.
The other turning point, however, is no longer a geological-biological one: it
occurs at the threshold of civilization. The exogenous factor here is Ananke,
the conscious struggle for existence. It enforces the repressive controls of
the sex instincts (first through the brute violence of the primal father, then
through institutionalization and internalization), as well as the
transformation of the death instinct into socially useful aggression and
morality. This organization of the instincts (actually a long process) creates
the civilized division of labor, progress, and law and order"; but it also
starts the chain of events that leads to the progressive weakening of Eros and
thereby to the growth of aggressiveness and guilt feeling. We have seen that
this development is not "inherent" in the struggle for existence but only in
its oppressive organization, and that at the present stage the possible
conquest of want makes this struggle ever more irrational.
[...]
In the biological-geological conditions which Freud assumed for the living
substance as such, no such change can be envisaged; the birth of life continues
to be a trauma, and thus the reign of the Nirvana principle seems to be
unshakable. However, the derivatives of the death instinct operate only in
fusion with the sex instincts; as long as life grows, the former remain
subordinate to the latter; the fate of the destrudo (the "energy" of the
destruction instincts) depends on that of the libido. Consequently, a
qualitative change in the development of sexuality must necessarily alter the
manifestations of the death instinct.
Thus, the hypothesis of a non-repressive civilization must be theoretically
validated first by demonstrating the possibility of a nonrepressive development
of the libido under the conditions of mature civilization. The direction of
such a development is indicated by those mental forces which, according to
Freud, remain essentially free from the reality principle and carry over this
freedom into the world of mature consciousness. Their re-examination must be
the next step.
### Detours to death: death instinct and negentropy
Our re-examination must therefore begin with Freud's analysis of the death
instinct. We have seen that, in Freud's late theory of the instincts, the
"compulsion inherent in organic life to restore an earlier state of things
which the living entity has been obliged to abandon under the pressure of
external disturbing forces" 4 is common to both primary instincts: Eros and
death instinct. Freud regards this retrogressive tendency as an expression of
the "inertia" in organic life, and ventures the following hypothetical
explanation: at the time when life originated in inanimate matter, a strong
"tension" developed which the young organism strove to relieve by returning to
the inanimate condition. 5 At the early stage of organic life, the road to the
previous state of inorganic existence was probably very short, and dying very
easy; but gradually "external influences " lengthened this road and compelled
the organism to take ever longer and more complicated "detours to death."
[[!img detours-to-death.png link="no"]]
### Phantasy
Phantasy plays a most decisive function in the total mental structure: it links
the deepest layers of the unconscious with the highest products of
consciousness (art), the dream with the reality; it preserves the archetypes of
the genus, the perpetual but repressed ideas of the collective and individual
memory, the tabooed images of freedom.
[...]
The recognition of phantasy (imagination) as a thought process with its own
laws and truth values was not new in psychology and philosophy; Freud' s
original contribution lay in the attempt to show the genesis of this mode of
thought and its essential connection with the pleasure principle. The
establishment of the reality principle causes a division and mutilation of the
mind which fatefully determines its entire development. The mental process
formerly unified in the pleasure ego is now split: its main stream is channeled
into the domain of the reality principle and brought into line with its
requirements. Thus conditioned, this part of the mind obtains the monopoly of
interpreting, manipulating, and altering reality -- of governing remembrance
and oblivion, even of defining what reality is and how it should be used and
altered. The other part of the mental apparatus remains free from the control
of the reality principle -- at the price of becoming powerless,
inconsequential, unrealistic.
Whereas the ego was formerly guided and driven by the whole of its mental
energy, it is now to be guided only by that part of it which conforms to the
reality principle. This part and this part alone is to set the objectives,
norms, and values of the ego; as reason it becomes the sole repository of
judgment, truth, rationality; it decides what is useful and useless, good and
evil. 2 Phantasy as a separate mental process is born and at the same time
left behind by the organization of the pleasure ego into the reality ego.
Reason prevails: it becomes unpleasant but useful and correct; phantasy remains
pleasant but becomes useless, untrue -- a mere play, daydreaming. As such, it
continues to speak the language of the pleasure principle, of freedom from
repression, of uninhibited desire and gratification -- but reality proceeds
according to the laws of reason, no longer committed to the dream language.
## Unsublimated pleasure
Smell and taste give, as it were, unsublimated pleasure per se (and unrepressed
disgust). They relate (and separate) individuals immediately, without the
......@@ -424,8 +601,25 @@ Superego:
and to prevent spontaneous relationships and thènatural' animal -like
expressions of such relations."
### Art
Still, within the limits of the aesthetic form, art expressed, although in an
ambivalent manner , the return of the repressed image of liberation; art was
opposition. At the present stage, in the period of total mobilization, even
this highly ambivalent opposition seems no longer viable. Art survives only
where it cancels itself , where it saves its substance by denying its
traditional form and thereby denying reconciliation: where it becomes
surrealistic and atonal. 6 Otherwise, art shares the fate of all genuine human
communication : it dies off.
[...]
In a less sublimated form, the opposition of phantasy to the reality principle
is more at home in such sub-real and surreal processes as dreaming,
daydreaming, play, the "stream of consciousness."
### Misc
But, again, Freud shows that this repressive system does not really solve the
conflict. Civilization plunges into a destructive dialectic: the perpetual
restrictions on Eros ultimately weaken the life instincts and thus strengthen
......@@ -568,3 +762,33 @@ Superego:
whole, whose existence is its denial. This foe appears as the archenemy and
Antichrist himself : he is everywhere at all times ; he represents hidden and
sinister forces, and his omnipresence requires total mobilization.
[...]
Being is essentially the striving for pleasure. This striving becomes an "aim"
in the human existence: the erotic impulse to combine living substance into
ever larger and more durable units is the instinctual source of civilization.
The sex instincts are life instincts: the impulse to preserve and enrich life
by mastering nature in accordance with the developing vital needs is originally
an erotic impulse.
Ananke is experienced as the barrier against the satisfaction of the life
instincts, which seek pleasure, not security. And the "struggle for existence"
is originally a struggle for pleasure: culture begins with the collective
implementation of this aim. Later, however, the struggle for existence is
organized in the interest of domination: the erotic basis of culture is
transformed. When philosophy conceives the essence of being as Logos, it is
already the Logos of domination -- commanding, mastering, directing reason, to
which man and nature are to be subjected Freud' s interpretation of being in
terms of Eros recaptures the early stage of Plato's philosophy, which conceived
of culture not as the repressive sublimation but as the free
self-development of Eros. As early as Plato, this conception appears as an
archaic-mythical residue. Eros is being absorbed into Logos, and Logos is
reason which subdues the instincts.
The history of ontology reflects the reality principle which governs the world
ever more exclusively: The insights contained in the metaphysical notion of
Eros were driven underground. They survived, in eschatological distortion, in
many heretic movements, in the hedonistic philosophy. Their history has still
to be written -- as has the history of the transformation of Eros in Agape. 29
Freud's own theory follows the general trend: in his work, the rationality of
the predominant reality principle supersedes the metaphysical speculations on
Eros.
books/psicologia/eros-civilization/detours-to-death.png

126 KiB

0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment