Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Unverified Commit d06d921a authored by rhatto's avatar rhatto
Browse files

Updates books

parent c0023591
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
[[!meta tile="Os Jogos e os Homens"]]
[[!meta title="Os Jogos e os Homens"]]
A máscara e a vertigem
......
[[!meta title="The Cathedral & The Bazaar"]]
[[!tag jogo software foss economics]]
* Author: Eric S. Raymond
## Main themes
## Phenomenology
* Linus Law: "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" (page 30);
"debugging is parallelizable" (page 32).
......@@ -14,7 +15,7 @@
* Brooks Law: "complexity and communication costs of a project rise with the
square number of developers" (pages 32, 49).
## Misc
## Freedom and hierarchy
* Kropotkin is cited at page 52: "principle of understanding" versus the
"principle of command".
......@@ -25,3 +26,56 @@
more elaborate and efficient than any amount of central planning could have
achieved." (page 52). Logo em seguida ele nega a existência de um autruísmo
puro.
## Economics
A very liberal point of view:
* Homesteading the Noosphere: "customs that regulate the ownership and control
of open-source software [...] imply an underlying theory of property rights
homologous to the Lockean theory of land tenure" (65).
* Open Source as a gift economy like a reputation game (81 - 83):
Most ways humans have of organizing are adaptations to scarcity
and want. Each way carries with it different ways of gaining social status.
The simples way is the _command hierarchy_ [where] scarce goods are allocated
by onde central authority and backed up by force. Command hierarchies scale
very poorly; they become increasingly inefficient as they get larger.
[...]
Our society is predominantly an exchange economy. This is a sofisticated
adaptation to scarcity that, unlike the command model, scales quite well.
Allocation of scarce goods is done in a decentralized way through trade
and voluntary coopreation.
[...]
Gift cultures are adaptations not to scarcity but to abundance. They arise
in populations that do not have significant material scarcity problems
with survival goods.
[...]
Abundance makes command relationships difficult to sustain and exchange
relationships an almost pointless game. In gift cultures, social status
is determined not by what you control but by _what you give away_.
-- 80-81
He also explains that the reputation game is not the only drive in the
bazaar-style ecosystem: satisfation, love, the "joy of craftsmanship" are also
motivations for software development (pages 82-83), which is compatible
with the gift economy model:
How can one maximize quality if there is no metric for quality?
If scarcity economics doesn't operate, what metrics are available
besides peer evaluation?
Other respondents related peer-esteem rewards and the joy of hacking
to the levels above subsistence needs in Abraham Maslow's well-known
'hierachy of values' model of human motivation.
-- 82-83
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment