Update linux-packaging.md

pages/about-us/news/2020/linux-packaging.md

@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ its
 decisions](https://jatan.blog/2020/05/02/ubuntu-snap-obsession-has-snapped-me-off-of-it/).
 
 Our primary target audience has always being the less computer wise users. In 
-GNU/Linux most of this users use ubuntu. That has being our main reason to focus 
-or energies on supporting ubuntu users. And snap makes it very easy to include 
+GNU/Linux most of these users use ubuntu. That has been our main reason to focus 
+our energies on supporting ubuntu users. And snap makes it very easy to include 
 software in ubuntu so is easy to install in this platform.  Also the most used 
 distros around are debian based, and snap usually works well on those.
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ One of the other options we have explored is flatpack. I think it's architecture
 is great, its security is really nice and it solves some of the problems of snap 
 (is not centralized, the control is in the users, ...). But flatpack is designed 
 to containerize the applications, making impossible to package something like a 
-VPN in snap as a VPN needs to modify the network configuration and the firewall 
+VPN, because it needs to modify the network configuration and the firewall 
 which is by design not allowed by flatpack. So, for us flatpack is not an 
 option.
 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Snap does containerize as well, but this is something that you can disable when
 you make the snap by using the 'classic' mode. We do that to be able to package 
 a VPN into snap.
 
-From the core team we might not have the time in near future to work on any 
+From the core team we might not have the time in the near future to work on any 
 other packages. But we will welcome any contributors. If you would like to 
 package the VPN for your favourite package manager we'll be really happy to 
 help. Don't hesitate to [open an