Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
H
hddemux
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
dkg
hddemux
Commits
c27df890
Commit
c27df890
authored
8 years ago
by
dkg
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
warn against mixing with other multiplexers (Closes #2)
parent
79d65724
Branches
Branches containing commit
Tags
Tags containing commit
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
draft-dkg-dprive-demux-dns-http.md
+21
-0
21 additions, 0 deletions
draft-dkg-dprive-demux-dns-http.md
with
21 additions
and
0 deletions
draft-dkg-dprive-demux-dns-http.md
+
21
−
0
View file @
c27df890
...
...
@@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ informative:
RFC7830:
RFC7858:
I-D.ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http:
HAPROXY:
target: https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
title: The Proxy protocol
author:
name: Willy Tarreau
ins: W. Tarreau
org: HAProxy Technologies
date: 2017-03-10
normative:
RFC1035:
RFC1945:
...
...
@@ -144,6 +152,19 @@ fail or trigger other "interesting" behaviors. This approach should
be done only in channels sufficiently obscured that a transparent
proxy would not try to interpret the resultant stream.
Avoid mixing with other demultiplexing
--------------------------------------
Some other (non-IETF) systems (e.g. {{HAPROXY}}) take a similar
approach with multiplexing data on top of HTTP by taking advantage of
bitpatterns that are presumed to not be present in normal HTTP
requests.
Use of the approach described in this draft in conjunction with these
other approaches is not advisable. Doing so safely would require
explicit and detailed review of all three (or more) protocols
involved.
Why not ALPN?
-------------
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment