Two documentations about installing bitmask that say different things
The documentation on https://leap.se/en/docs/client/user-install says
Standalone bundle Maybe the quickest way of running Bitmask in your machine is using the standalone bundle. That is the recommended way to use Bitmask for the time being.
The documentation on https://dl.bitmask.net/linux/ says
Install as packages This is the recommended method of installing Bitmask. If installed as a package, Bitmask will run faster, be better integrated in the system, and will be kept up to date.
I more or less my accident came across bitmask.net always went so leap.se before, that I can login there, the better looking site and it seems to be a more up to date documentation. So I think you should better redirect people there instead having to places probably edited by two different persons.
Also I think you should better "advertise" that this thing is "highly experimental" as this nice red message I saw once on bitmask.net after I already downloaded and ran it from leap.se. I just saw the "2014 June: Official release of Email ..." and thought it is almost stable by then or something. Since I continue to have login issues I and I saw this message I guess this is more alpha then stable right?
(from redmine: created on 2014-02-20, closed on 2014-03-14, relates #5300 (closed))