diff --git a/free-network-definition.markdown b/free-network-definition.markdown
index 59fbb580433972e32c2f2ef29a081ba27b918d02..4e07cc4f9ce44d9c9ca863cdbaa018d70baec376 100644
--- a/free-network-definition.markdown
+++ b/free-network-definition.markdown
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 The fundamental dialectic of our struggle is this: will we be enslaved by our
-technology, or liberated by it? 
+technology, or liberated by it?
 
 It was in cognizance of this notion, and in service to our collective freedom
 that the Free Software Movement was born. It is in this spirit that we aim here
 to define exactly what it means to say that a network is free.  We hope that
 the existence of this definition will help illuminate the path to a more just
-world. 
+world.
 
 Our intention is to build communications systems that are owned by the people
 that use them, that allow participants to own their own data, and that use
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ end-to-end encryption and cryptographic trust mechanisms to assure privacy. We
 call such systems 'free networks' and they are characterized by the following
 five freedoms:
 
-* Freedom 0) The freedom to participate in the network. 
+* Freedom 0) The freedom to participate in the network.
 
   Freedom 0 regards your right to organize cooperative networks.  Conventional
   networks are characterized by a distinction between provider and user. This
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ five freedoms:
   and users as the same time, and growth is auto-distributed by treating any
   profits as investment. In this way, those that join the network are able to
   become owners. This mode of organization encourages network operation in the
-  service of the common good. 
+  service of the common good.
 
-* Freedom 1) The freedom to determine where one's bits are stored. 
+* Freedom 1) The freedom to determine where one's bits are stored.
 
   Freedom 1 regards your right to own the material stores of your data.
   Conventional networks encourage (if not force) their participants to store
@@ -36,18 +36,18 @@ five freedoms:
   their homes. Participants ought to be free to store their own data (so that it
   is under their care) without sacrificing their ability to publish it.
 
-* Freedom 2) The freedom to determine the parties with whom one's bits are shared. 
+* Freedom 2) The freedom to determine the parties with whom one's bits are shared.
 
-  Freedom 2 regards your right to control access to your data. 
+  Freedom 2 regards your right to control access to your data.
 
   Data mining and the monetization of sharing has become common practice.
   Participants should be free to chose those with whom they would like to share a
   given piece of information. Only someone who owns their own data can fully
   exercise this freedom, but it is an issue regardless of where the relevant bits
-  are stored. 
+  are stored.
 
 * Freedom 3) The freedom to transmit bits to one's peers without the prospect
-  of interference, interception or censorship. 
+  of interference, interception or censorship.
 
   Freedom 3 regards the right to speak freely with your peers.
 
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ five freedoms:
   they reach their destination.
 
 * Freedom 4) The freedom to maintain anonymity, or to present a unique, trusted
-  identity. 
+  identity.
 
   Freedom 4 regards your right to construct your own identity